The ex Mrs. McCartney is rumored to be miffed about her divorce settlement from Sir Paul McCartney (aka her knight in unshining armour).
I read here http://entertainment.oneindia.in/music/international/2009/heather-mills-complain-divorce-210409.html that she complained that she only got 5% of their networth earned during the seven year marriage as a settlement. And she claims she “worked her butt” off doing concert tour promotions and everything. She got about $35 million in settlement.
5% after 7 years….hme…first of all, for some reason, I thought England had more of a community property scheme…wait a second. Let me look at something…. http://www.divorcesaloon.com/the-globetrotters-guide-to-divorce Yes, I remember this post and I did do a bit of research and I think the scheme in London is more community property-esque–maybe even more inclusive than California in some respects.
If that is the case, how come Heather only got 5% after 7 years? Especially if she did all that concert tour promotions on his behalf? That’s hard work! I mean, she got about $35 million. And that’s good money, don’t get me wrong. But, just from a legal perspective, I wonder why they cheap-skated her like that? Bet you she feels that that marriage was the worse mistake of her life!
ALL HEATHER MILLS REFERENCES HERE: http://www.divorcesaloon.com/index.php?s=deborah+madoff
